论文部分内容阅读
20世纪已经结束了。 2 0世纪的中国发生了天翻地覆的巨大变化。2 0世纪的中国史学同样经历了急剧的演变。在跨入新世纪的时刻 ,为了更好地推动中国史学的发展 ,我们很有必要认真地总结和反思它在 2 0世纪的发展。大家都承认 ,2 0世纪的中国史学取得了重大的成就 ,同时也存在许多问题。在学界中对这些成就和问题至今存在着不同的看法 ,这本是很正常的现象。重要的是 ,我们应该通过不同意见的交流和切磋来加深我们的认识 ,更好地进行总结和反思 ,从而促使我国的史学在新世纪发展得更快更健康。这就是本刊举办这次学术讨论的目的。应该说明的是 :一 ,这次学术讨论的题目和范围是 2 0世纪中国史学的发展 ,重点是 1 94 9年新中国成立以后。二 ,讨论的重点是对 2 0世纪的中国史学或其中的某个阶段 ,或某个学派 ,某个学术思潮 ,某个史学分支 ,某个重大专题 ,某个史学领域 ,某种重要现象等从总体上进行观察和评述。一般不对某个具体学者进行讨论和评述。三 ,讨论必须坚持“百花齐放 ,百家争鸣”的方针。欢迎发表各种不同意见 ,进行平等的讨论。四 ,讨论中的任何意见均不代表编辑部的看法。文责均由作者自负。
The twentieth century is over. Great changes have taken place in China in the 20th century. Chinese historiography in the 20th century also underwent a dramatic evolution. In the new century, in order to better promote the development of Chinese historiography, it is very necessary for us to seriously summarize and reflect on its development in the 20th century. Everyone acknowledges that great achievements have been made in Chinese historiography in the 20th century and that there are also many problems at the same time. In the academic world, there are different views on these achievements and problems so far. This is a normal phenomenon. What is important is that we should deepen our understanding and make better summaries and reflections through exchanges and discussions of different opinions so as to promote our history to develop faster and healthier in the new century. This is the purpose of holding this academic discussion. It should be noted that: 1. The topic and scope of this academic discussion are the development of Chinese historiography in the 20th century, with the emphasis on the founding of New China in 1994. Second, the discussion focused on the Chinese history in the 20th century or one of its stages, or a school, an academic trend, a branch of history, a major topic, a field of history, an important phenomenon, etc. From the overall observation and review. Generally do not discuss and comment on a specific scholar. Third, the discussion must adhere to the principle of “letting a hundred flowers bloom and a hundred schools of thought contend.” Welcome to all kinds of different opinions, for an equal discussion. Fourth, any comment in the discussion does not represent the views of the editorial department. Article responsibility by the author conceit.