清華簡《皇門》篇,見於今本《逸周書·皇門》篇,簡本《皇門》篇與今本《皇門》篇比較,在異文方面,除了今本有許多譌誤之外,今本多將先秦古體字改爲漢代以後流行的字體,以及一些避諱改字。因此,雖然簡本與今本基本相同,但簡本更接近原本,所以以簡本爲依據探討其寫成的時代。簡本《皇門》篇爲西周初年的文獻之説是目前最盛行的説法,如李學勤先生《清華簡九篇綜述》、孫飛燕《清華簡〈皇門〉管窺》、朱鳳瀚先生《讀清華楚簡〈皇門〉》、杜勇先生《清華簡〈皇門〉的製作年代及相關史事問題》等。(1)孫飛燕《清華簡〈皇門〉管窺》基於《皇門》篇中一些詞語見於西周金文、《詩經》、《尚書》,從而確定《皇門》爲西周文獻。朱鳳瀚先生《讀清華楚簡〈皇門〉》通過字詞的詳細考證和内容的深入研究,認爲:“現 Tsinghua University, ”Huang Men“ articles, found in today’s ”Yizhoushu · Huang Men“ articles, simplified version of ”Huang Men“ articles and today’s ”Huang Men“ articles, in foreign languages, in addition to this book there are many mistakes In addition, this book will be more pre-Qin ancient body into the popular font after the Han Dynasty, as well as some taboo words. Therefore, although the simplified version is basically the same as the present version, the simplified version is more similar to the original one, so the era of writing is explored on the basis of the simplified version. The simplified version of ”Huang Men“ is the most popular argument for the early years of the Western Zhou Dynasty. For example, Mr. Li Xueqin’s ”Brief Summary of Tsinghua Jiujiu“, ”Sun Yat-sen“ ”Tsinghua jan.“ Chu bamboo slips, ”Mr. Du Yong’s“ Qinghua Jian