论文部分内容阅读
当代生态经济学指责马克思和恩格斯对波多林斯基问题保持沉默和拒斥态度,认为这表明马克思主义经济理论缺乏对生产、劳动和价值等问题的生态关注,但这种对马克思主义“生态断裂”的批判并不成立。波多林斯基神话的庸俗机械论和能量还原论将价值等问题脱离历史和社会语境,强调能量转换的质的性质而非其量的性质,破除波多林斯基神话的意识形态迷雾有助于当代中国化马克思主义获得两个更为广阔的生态愿景:一是基于可持续发展的物质变换断裂的系统修复;二是基于热力学的能量耗散和马克思主义的生态伦理。
Contemporary ecological economics criticizes Marx and Engels for their silence and rejection of Podolinski’s view, which shows that Marxist economic theory lacks the ecological focus on issues such as production, labor and value. However, this theory of Marxism Fracture "does not hold the critique. The vulgar mechanistic and energy-reductionism of Podolski’s myth divorces issues of value from historical and social contexts, emphasizing the qualitative rather than the quantitative nature of energy conversion, and the fog of ideology that breaks Podolski’s myth helps In contemporary Chinese Marxism, two broader ecological visions are obtained: one is the systematic restoration of the fracture of material transformation based on sustainable development; the other is the energy dissipation based on thermodynamics and the ecological ethics of Marxism.