论文部分内容阅读
《清宫秘史》事件,可称为新中国电影史上的“第一”要案。之所以这样说,含义主要有两个。其一,《清宫秘史》公映后,因高层领导对于影片持以尖锐的批评意见,直接引发了新中国影坛的第一次大批判;其二,在文化大革命中,1967年4月1日,戚本禹著文《爱国主义还是卖国主义?——评反动影片〈清宫秘史〉》,时评号称“欢响了向党内头号走资派刘少奇进行总攻击的进军号”,由此引发了全国范围内公开批判刘少奇的大动乱,是为造成共和国最大冤案的铁证之一。多少年来,事关《清宫秘史》事件的文章报刊多见,但却罕有清晰的描述。本刊特地组发了孟犁野、金幸迪的文章,试图以今天的视角和最新的材料,对这一事件之来龙去脉予以再次的描述与评价,以求清迷茫、还原貌,顺天理之功效。
The Secret History of Qing Dynasty can be called the “first” important case in the history of the new Chinese film. The reason to say that there are two main implications. First, after the release of the Secret History of the Qing Palace, the sharp criticism of the film by top leaders directly aroused the first major criticism of the film industry in China. Second, during the Cultural Revolution, April 1, 1967 , Chi Ben Yu's article “Patriotism or the Quotain? - Comment on the reactionary film” Secret History of the Qing Dynasty, “when the commentary claims that” echoed the march to the capitalist number one Liu Shaoqi general attack, “triggering a nationwide Criticizing Liu Shao-chih's big turmoil openly is one of the ironclad evidence of the greatest injustice in the republic. Over the past few years, the articles related to the ”Secret History of the Qing Dynasty" have been widely read in newspapers but rarely described clearly. In this special issue of Mengli Ye, Jin Xingdi's article, trying to use today's perspective and the latest materials, the context of this incident to be described again and evaluation, in order to clear the confusion, restore appearance, the effect of Shuntianli.