“烂番茄”的威力有多大?

来源 :英语学习 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:h_f_m
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  當你打开电影购票网站想看看近期有什么电影值得观看时,是否注意到相关页面几乎都会有每部电影的评分?这些网站评分是否会影响你对电影的选择呢?在美国,成立于2000年的烂番茄网是最主流的电影评价和交流社区之一,它的评价体系是如何影响人们对电影的选择以及电影票房收入的呢?
  In February 2016, Rotten Tomatoes—the site that aggregates movie and TV critics’ opinions and tabulates a score that’s “fresh” or “rotten”—took on an elevated level of importance.2 That’s when Rotten Tomatoes (along with its parent company Flixster) was acquired by Fandango, the website that sells advance movie tickets for many major cinema chains.3

  People had been using Rotten Tomatoes to find movie reviews since it launched in 2000, but after Fandango acquired the site, it began posting“Tomatometer” scores next to movie ticket listings.4 Since then, studio execs have started to feel as if Rotten Tomatoes matters more than it used to—and in some cases, they’ve rejiggered their marketing strategies accordingly.5
  It’s easy to see why anyone might assume that Rotten Tomatoes scores became more tightly linked to ticket sales, with potential audiences more likely to buy tickets for a movie with a higher score, and by extension, giving critics more power over the purchase of a ticket.
  But that’s not the whole story. And as most movie critics(including myself) will tell you, the correlation between Rotten Tomatoes scores, critical opinion, marketing tactics, and actual box office return is complicated. It’s not a simple cause-and-effect situation.
  Here are some questions that many people have about Rotten Tomatoes, and review aggregation more generally—and some facts to clear up the confusion.
  How is a Rotten Tomatoes score calculated?
  The score that Rotten Tomatoes assigns to a film corresponds to the percentage of critics who’ve judged the film to be “fresh,” meaning their opinion of it is more positive than negative.6 The idea is to quickly offer moviegoers a sense of critical consensus7.
  “Our goal is to serve fans by giving them useful tools and one-stop8 access to critic reviews, user ratings, and entertainment news to help with their entertainment viewing decisions,” Jeff Voris, a vice president at Rotten Tomatoes, told me in an email.
  The opinions of about 3,000 critics—a.k.a. the “Approved Tomatometer Critics” who have met a series of criteria set by Rotten Tomatoes—are included in the site’s scores, though not every critic reviews every film, so any given score is more typically derived from a few hundred critics, or even less.9 The scores don’t include just anyone who calls themselves a critic or has a movie blog; Rotten Tomatoes only aggregates critics who have been regularly publishing movie reviews with a reasonably widely read outlet for at least two years, and those critics must be “active,”meaning they’ve published at least one review in the last year. The site also deems a subset of critics to be “top critics” and calculates a separate score that only includes them.10   Some critics (or staffers at their publications) upload their own reviews, choose their own pull quotes, and designate their review as “fresh”or “rotten.”11 Other critics (including myself) have their reviews uploaded, pull-quoted, and tagged as fresh or rotten by the Rotten Tomatoes staff. In the second case, if the staff isn’t sure whether to tag a review as fresh or rotten, they reach out to the critic for clarification. And critics who don’t agree with the site’s designation can request that it be changed.

  As the reviews of a given film accumulate, the Rotten Tomatoes score measures the percentage that are more positive than negative, and assigns an overall fresh or rotten rating to the movie. Scores of over 60 percent are considered fresh, and scores of 59 percent and under are rotten. To earn the coveted“designated fresh” seal,12 a film needs at least 40 reviews, 75 percent of which are fresh, and five of which are from “top” critics.
  Does a movie’s Rotten Tomatoes score affect its box office earnings?
  The short version: It can, but not necessarily in the ways you might think.
  A good Rotten Tomatoes score indicates strong critical consensus, and that can be good for smaller films in particular. It’s common for distributors to roll out such films slowly, opening them in a few key cities (usually New York and Los Angeles, and maybe a few others) to generate good buzz—not just from critics, but also on social media and through word of mouth.13 The result, they hope, is increased interest and ticket sales when the movie opens in other cities.
  Get Out 14, for example, certainly profited from the 99 percent “fresh” score it’s earned since its limited opening. And The Big Sick15 became one of last summer’s most beloved films, helped along by its 98 percent rating. But a bad score for a small film can help ensure that it will close quickly, or play in fewer cities overall. Its potential box office earnings, in turn, will inevitably take a hit16.

  Yet when it comes to blockbusters, franchises, and other big studio films (which usually open in many cities at once), it’s much less clear how much a film’s Rotten Tomatoes score affects its box office tally.17 A good Rotten Tomatoes score, for example, doesn’t necessarily guarantee a film will be a hit18. Atomic Blonde is“guaranteed fresh,” with a 77 percent rating, but it hasn’t done very well at the box office despite being an action film starring Charlize Theron.19   Still, studios certainly seem to believe the score makes a difference. Studios blamed Rotten Tomatoes scores (and by extension, critics) when poorly reviewed movies like Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales, Baywatch, and The Mummy performed below expectations at the box office.20
  But that correlation doesn’t really hold up. The Emoji Movie, for example, was critically panned, garnering an abysmal six percent Rotten Tomatoes score.21 But it still opened to $25 million in the US, which put it just behind the acclaimed Christopher Nolan film Dunkirk.22 And the more you think about it, the less surprising it is that plenty of people bought tickets to The Emoji Movie in spite of its bad press: It’s an animated movie aimed at children that faced virtually no theatrical competition, and it opened during last summer, when kids are out of school. Great reviews might have inflated its numbers, but almost universally negative ones didn’t seem to hurt it much.23
  It’s also worth noting that many films with low Rotten Tomatoes scores that also perform poorly in the US do just fine overseas, particularly in Asia. The Mummy gave Tom Cruise24 his biggest global opening ever. If there is a Rotten Tomatoes effect, it seems to only extend to the American market.
  1. Rotten Tomatoes: 烂番茄网站,提供电影、电视剧的相关评论、资讯和新闻。
  2. 2016年2月,烂番茄网变得更加举足轻重、炙手可热。这家网站综合了评论家对电影和电视剧的评价,为影片打出“新鲜”或“腐烂”的评分。aggregate: 聚集,综合;tabulate: 制成表格,列表显示;elevated:提高的,抬高的。
  3. 当时,烂番茄网连同其母公司Flixster一同被范丹戈公司收购,范丹戈公司为许多大型连锁影院出售电影预售票。parent company: 总公司,母公司;acquire: 收购;Flixster: 一家美国社交电影网站,提供电影预告片以及即将上映的电影和票房信息;Fandango: 范丹戈,美国电影互联网售票公司。
  4. launch: 创办;Tomatometer: 是烂番茄独创的词汇,意为“番茄尺”,字面上表示衡量番茄的腐烂程度,其实是衡量影视的好坏。
  5. exec: 经理,管理人员;rejigger:〈美俚〉重新安排,更改。
  6. 烂番茄给电影的评分取决于影评家给出“新鲜”评价的比例,“新鲜”即意味着他们对其的评价更趋正面。
  7. consensus: 共识。
  8. one-stop: 一站式的。
  9. 网站对电影的评分包括约3,000位影评家的评价,他们也就是官方认证的烂番茄影评家,达到了烂番茄一系列的资历标准。然而,影评家不可能每部电影都看过,因此,一部电影的评分通常只来源于几百名影评家的评价,甚至更少。a.k.a.: also known as,亦称,又名。
  10. deem: 认为,视作;subset: 一部分。
  11. staffer: 职员(尤指编辑或记者);pull quote: 从正文中选取常被用作副标题等的醒目引文;designate: 标示,标明。
  12. coveted: 令人垂涎的,梦寐以求的;seal:印章。
  13. distributor: 发行商;buzz: 口碑,评价;word of mouth: 口碑,口口相传。
  14. Get Out: 《逃出绝命镇》,2017年美國惊悚片,电影获得了影评人与观众的一致好评,虽然成本仅450万美元,却获得了高达2.55亿美元的票房收入。
  15. The Big Sick: 《大病》,2017年美国爱情电影,改编自真实故事,讲述了一个巴基斯坦移民在美国的生活。
  16. take a hit: 遭受打击,受到影响。
  17. blockbuster: 流行大片,大制作影片;franchise:系列电影;box office tally: 票房收入。
  18. hit: 成功且轰动一时的电影或演出等。
  19. Atomic Blonde: 《极寒之城》,2017年美国间谍动作惊悚片;Charlize Theron: 查理兹·塞隆,南非女演员及联合国亲善大使,南非第一位奥斯卡金像奖得主。
  20. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales:《加勒比海盗5:死无对证》,美国奇幻海盗冒险电影;Baywatch:《海滩游侠》,美国动作喜剧片;The Mummy:《新木乃伊》,美国动作冒险奇幻片,为1999年电影《木乃伊》和“木乃伊系列电影”的重启版。
  21. 例如,《表情奇幻冒险》受到了严厉的批评,在烂番茄上得到了极低的6%的好评率。The Emoji Movie: 《表情奇幻冒险》,美国动画喜剧电影;pan: 严厉批评;garner: 得到,获得;abysmal: // 糟糕透顶的。
  22. acclaimed: 广受好评的;Christopher Nolan:克里斯托弗·诺兰,英国男导演、编剧及监制,被认为是21世纪最成功和最受好评的电影导演之一,他的10部电影在全球获得超过47亿美元的票房,囊括26项奥斯卡提名和六项大奖;Dunkirk: 《敦刻尔克》,2017年由英国、法国、美国及荷兰合拍的战争电影,由克里斯托弗·诺兰执导和编剧。
  23. 高度的好评未必能提升一部影片的票房收入,但普遍负面的评价似乎也影响甚微。inflate:扩大,提高。
  24. Tom Cruise: 汤姆·克鲁斯,美国男演员及电影制片人,电影《新木乃伊》主演。
其他文献
推荐书目:《高考英语外刊阅读及模拟强化训练》  主 编:外研基础测评中心  出版信息:外语教学与研究出版社 2020年8月  推 荐 人:王晓静(项目策划)  自2014年9月《國务院关于深化考试招生制度改革的实施意见》正式发布以来,第一、二批进入新高考的省市陆续发布了高考改革实施方案。2020年,第二批高考改革区域正式开始实施高考改革,辽宁、河北、重庆、湖北、湖南、江苏、福建和广东八省市也将于2
Carla Brings Me to My... Census1  那些人口普查员整日守在路旁“虎视眈眈”,我一出现,他们就冲过来抓住我,企图挖走我的一切私人信息。那可是我的隐私,凭什么要告诉他们?听,他们又来敲门了。别妄想了,我绝对不会给他们开门的。反正我已经把百叶窗关上了,他们不知道我在家。我以为等他们走了就万事大吉了。可是有一天,Carla来了……  W e’d heard they wer
本篇选自美国作家克劳伦斯·戴伊(1874-1935)的《与父亲一起生活》(Life with Father),该书写于1935年,是一部诙谐幽默的自传体小说。父亲对周围的一切事物都有着过分的严苛,但却也因此显得可爱而滑稽。该部小说通过描写“我”和家人的生活,刻画出19世纪末美国中上层阶级的家庭生活状态,是作者最具代表性的作品之一。 克莱伦斯一家一到夏天就离开纽约市区去乡下度假,但是老克莱伦斯对乡下
十期答案  1. Explain the following words and expressions (highlighted in blue) in English.  (1) feat, lamentably (Para. 2)  a) feat: If you refer to an action, or the result of an action, as a feat, you a
不久前,第25万辆豪华运动型全能车途锐在大众汽车位于布拉迪斯拉发的工厂下线。这辆金属闪银色的途锐配备了5.0 升最大输出功率达到250千瓦的V10 TDI柴油直喷发动机,秉承了其自2003年推出以来一贯的、享誉业界的操控敏捷、豪华舒适、激情澎湃等特点。  途锐两年前正式进入中国市场以来,中国消费者和驾驶爱好者得以亲身体验到这一全球多功能运动车领域最领先、最热销产品的魅力。    作为大众汽车最富激
摆脱网络?你钱够吗?  如今,我们出门找路离不开“谷歌地图”,拍照发图离不开“美图秀秀”,联系小伙伴离不开“微信”,吃饭总想找“大众点评”,肚子饿了直接掏出手机点开“饿了么”,想买东西就点开“淘宝”……渐渐地,你觉得网络已经占据你生活的所有角落,于是开始反抗。可是,离开网络的那一刻,一切都变得麻烦起来……  阅读感评  秋叶 评  本人得承认我在接受互联网与智能手机方面是非常滞后的,直到2015年
标识语是指在公共场所展示的文字,具有特殊交际功能,一般具有提供信息、提醒、警示或完成指令的作用。现在来华旅游的外国游客越来越多,大部分景区在汉语标识语的下面也都添加了英文翻译,以方便外国游客。但是差强人意的翻译往往会影响游客理解,反倒带来诸多不便。若译文中错误太多,不仅使外国游客不知何意,反而可能破坏他们对名胜古迹的美好印象,令人贻笑大方。下文的例子中虽然没有“请在一米外等候”(Please Wa
丘吉尔的奇闻轶事
摘 要:《新概念英语》是一套以非英语国家的英语学习者为对象,涵盖初级至高级,以训练和培养学生听、说、读、写能力为目的的综合英语教材。其教学理念主要体现在严格的循序渐进原则,课文趣味性强,不以语法为中心,让学习者在诵读、欣赏美文的过程中体会英语在真实场景中的运用,增强英语的语感。  关键词:新版;循序渐进;趣味性;语言运用能力;语感  国内英语学习者当中大概很少有人不知道《新概念英语》。第一版《新概
Imagine an area 34 times the size of Manhattan. Now imagine it covered ankle-deep in plastic waste—piles of soda bottles and plastic bags, takeout containers by the mile, drinking straws as far as the