论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比分析剖宫产在瘢痕子宫和非瘢痕子宫中的临床应用效果。方法:选取2012年2月至2013年11月在我院妇产科进行剖宫产分娩的瘢痕子宫和非瘢痕子宫的产妇68例,分析探究其手术相关的临床资料,比较剖宫产在两种性质子宫产妇中的应用。结果:进行剖宫产分娩的产妇的临床资料中,瘢痕性子宫产妇的年龄明显比非瘢痕组产妇大,并且瘢痕性子宫产妇在手术过程中的出血量以及手术时长也明显大于非瘢痕性子宫产妇,术后腹腔粘连情况也重于非瘢痕性子宫产妇,其差异具有统计意义(P<0.05);两组产妇分娩出的新生儿在出生时的体重以及1min、5min的Apgar评分均无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:瘢痕子宫在剖宫产手术中的风险系数明显高于非瘢痕子宫,因此在瘢痕子宫产妇的分娩中需要更加注意手术中的相应风险因子,保证产妇顺利分娩。
Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical effect of cesarean section in uterus and non-scarring uterus. Methods: From February 2012 to November 2013 in our hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology cesarean delivery of cesarean section in 68 cases of uterine and non-scar maternal maternal analysis of clinical data related to surgery, compared cesarean section in two The nature of uterus maternal application. Results: In the clinical data of cesarean section delivery, the age of cicatricial uterus was significantly larger than that of non-scar group, and the amount of bleeding and duration of operation during cicatricial uterus were significantly greater than that of non-cicatrical uterus The postpartum abdominal adhesions were also heavier in non-scarring uterus than those in non-scarring uterus (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in body weight at birth, Apgar scores at 1 minute and 5 minutes between two groups Difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion: The risk coefficient of scarring uterus in cesarean section surgery is significantly higher than that of non-scarring uterus. Therefore, it is necessary to pay more attention to the corresponding risk factors during operation of scarring uterine maternity to ensure the smooth delivery of maternal.