本文讨论强调句式中“是”和“的”的句法地位 ,结论为 :前者不是系动词 ,后者不是动词名物化的标记。汉语的动词可以名词化 ,动词短语也可以名物化 ,但两个过程都不牵涉具体的形态标记。这些虽然是理论问题 ,但常常会在汉语教学中以不同的形式表现出来 ,汉语教师需要具备一定的理论知识才能真正做好教学工作。 This paper discusses the syntactic position of emphasizing “” and “” in the sentence. The conclusion is that the former is not a verb, and the latter is not a token of verb nominalization. Chinese verbs can be nominal, verb phrases can also be nominal, but the two processes are not involved in specific morphological markers. Although these are theoretical issues, they are often manifested in different forms in Chinese teaching. Chinese teachers need certain theoretical knowledge to really do their teaching.