论文部分内容阅读
根据相关资料,指出对饶家营“张骞墓”的第一次考古调查,是由陕西考古会组织并开展于1937年冬季。在1938年西北联合大学师生对张骞墓开展的考古发掘中,徐旭生先生是发掘计划的制订者和发掘工作的指导者,并梳理了张骞墓的调查、发掘人员名录。在分析1938年张骞墓发掘后的墓葬时代判断和墓主认定的过程后,按相关文献重新对该墓墓前石刻、墓道发掘资料进行了整理,并结合数十年来对区域汉墓发展规律的认识,指出饶家营“张骞墓”的时代要远晚于张骞去世和埋葬的西汉中期早期阶段,该墓的墓主不可能是出使西域的张骞。并分析了文献所载的张骞墓位置记述,认为早期文献所述的城西二十三里的张骞墓,与晚期文献所述的城西八里的张骞墓并非一处。认为张骞墓的位置,应在城固县饶家营“张骞墓”更西的空间中寻找。
According to relevant information, it is pointed out that the first archaeological survey of Raojiaying “Zhang Qian Tomb” was organized by Shaanxi Archeology Association and carried out in the winter of 1937. In 1938, Northwestern United University teachers and students conducted an archaeological excavation on the tomb of Zhang Qian. Mr. Xu Xusheng was the planner and excavator of the excavation work, and sorted out the investigation of the tomb of Zhang Qian, to explore the list of personnel. After analyzing the judgment of the tombs era and the confirmation of the tomb masters after the excavations of Zhang Qian in 1938, the excavation data of the stone carvings and tomb roads in front of the tomb were reorganized according to the relevant documents, and with the understanding of the law of the development of the Han Tomb in the past decades , Pointing out that the era of Raojiaying’s “Tomb of Zhang Qian” was much later than the early stage of the middle Western Han Dynasty in which Zhang Qian died and was buried. It is impossible for the tomb’s owner to be Zhang Qian in the western region. And analyzes the description of the location of Zhang Qian tomb contained in the literature. He believes that the Zhang Qian tomb in Twenty-Three Years of Chengxi in the early literature is not the same one as the Zhang Qian tomb in the west of Bali in the late literature. That the location of Zhang Qian tomb, should be in Chenggu County Rao camp “Zhang Qian tomb ” more space to find.