论文部分内容阅读
作为自由主义者,哈耶克主张社会秩序是自然形成的扩展秩序,人类试图用理性方法对其控制和重构是狂妄和危险的,因而极力对技治主义进行批评。哈耶克批评唯科学主义并没有科学性,反对把自然科学方法论应用于社会科学领域,抨击乌托邦式的社会工程导致专制和独裁,指责社会工程师沦为极权主义的帮凶。从知识论和文化进化论的角度,他对技治主义的批评将社会工程问题转换为社会科学方法论问题,其研究逻辑并不严谨,观点过于极端,二元论思维严重,对社会工程一味排斥与现实情况不符。
As a liberal, Hayek argues that social order is an expanding order formed naturally. It is arrogant and dangerous for mankind to attempt to control and reconstruct it rationally. Therefore, he tries his best to criticize technocratism. Hayek criticized the lack of scientific scientism and opposed the application of natural science methodology to the field of social sciences. He criticized utopian social engineering for autocracy and dictatorship, accusing social engineers of becoming accomplices of totalitarianism. From the point of view of epistemology and cultural evolution, his criticism of absolutism transforms social engineering into social science methodology. His research logic is not rigorous. His views are too extreme. His theory of dualism is serious. His rejection of social engineering and the reality Does not match.