眼下,从中央到地方,从官员到百姓,都在谈论和实践“和谐”和“公平”的问题。而要认识这 个问题,这就需要解读一个“差距”的问题。 差距——任何事物既有联系又存在着“差距”,有的是相差无几,有的是不差上下,有的是千差万 别。但关键的是如何正确认识和对待“差距”。 我不敢苟同个别经济学家这种“差距”的观点:一个国家的人均GDP达到1000美元的时候,各种 社会矛盾多发,人们的差距将明显的表现出来,“不可避免地会出现不同的利益群体”。这种对“差距” 的“解围”话很值得商榷。我去的国家不多,但听到的或看到的外国的事倒不少,总感觉到拉丁美洲 也好、亚洲也好,似乎没有这种“利益群体”现象的“不可避免”。难道这些国家在人均GDP达到1000 美元的时候,他们的医疗也“医”得穷人看不起病?他们的教育也使穷人的孩子上不起学?他们也有 官煤勾结,而接连不断地导致矿难频发?这些“?”的存在,我想或许也是导致当前我国贫富差距逐 渐拉大的助燃因素吧!但其“差距”的内在原因似乎与人均GDP指标没有多大必然的联系。 Right now, from the central government to local governments, officials and people, they are all talking about and practicing the issue of “harmony” and “fairness.” To understand this issue, it is necessary to interpret a “gap” issue. Gap - anything has both the existence and the “gap”, some are almost the same, some are not bad, some are different. But the key is how to correctly understand and treat the “gaps.” I can not agree with the opinion of individual economists on such a “gap.” When the per capita GDP of a country reaches 1,000 U.S. dollars, various social conflicts are frequent and the gap between people will clearly manifest itself. “Inevitably, there will be different Interest groups. ” This “siege” of the “gap” is debatable. There are not many countries that I go to, but there are quite a few foreign ones heard or seen. I feel that Latin America and Asia are not “inevitable” of such “interest groups.” Do these countries, when the per capita GDP reaches 1,000 U.S. dollars, have their medical treatment also “poorly treated” by the poor? Their education can not afford to afford schooling for the poor; they also have collusion with officials and officials, The existence of these “?”, I think perhaps the current cause of our gradual widening gap between rich and poor combustion factors, but the “gap” of the underlying reason seems to be not necessarily linked with the per capita GDP indicators.