一、导言在政治哲学与法哲学中,反抗权问题一直以来都是一个争论不休的问题。从某种意义上讲,这一问题根源于亚里士多德所谓的人的政治本性。人不可能是单个的人,他必须并且必然要进入一个以统治一被统治结构为基础的政治共同体中。所以就必然产生这样的问题:人们是否负有普遍的服从统治者的义务?如果存在这种义务,那么当统治者的统治达到人们所无法忍受的程度甚或取消其作为一个独立个人之任何资格时,人们是否就取消了服从这种统治的普遍义务?对于这个问题的回答,我们可以在这么一条线上来加以描述,一 I. INTRODUCTION In political philosophy and jurisprudence, the issue of revolt has always been an issue of endless debate. In a sense, this problem stems from what Aristotle calls the human political nature. Man can not be a single person, he must and must enter a political community based on the rule of a dominated structure. So the question inevitably arises: Do people have a general obligation to obey the ruler? If such an obligation exists, then when the ruler’s rule reaches an unbearable level or even cancels any qualifications as an independent individual , Do people cancel the general obedience to such rule? For the answer to this question, we can describe it in such a way that one