一年一度的“金鸡奖”评选,众目睽睽,评选以后有这样、那样的议论本不足怪。去年,《乡音》得了大奖,夏衍声称自己不赞成,理由颇能服人,今年的评选结果一经宣布,人言纷纭。许多人为《高山下的花环》落选而愤愤不平,对《红衣少女》的得奖颇多微词。笔者对《花环》、《少女》均极喜欢。如要笔者投票,是赞成两片并列大奖的。我以为,同意谁得大奖,每个人都可坚持己见。然而在评定时,其理由应能服人。“金鸡奖”评选的讨论始末,本人无从知悉。然而,从见诸报端的《花环》落选理由来看,是很值得一议的。《经济日报》三月十七日发表了一篇题为《<高 The annual “Golden Rooster Award” selection, all eyes and feet, after the selection there is such a case, that argument is not strange. Last year, “accent” won the award. Xia Yan claimed that he did not agree with the reason quite convincing. As soon as the result of the selection this year was announced, there were divergent opinions. Many people are outraged by the unsuccessful “Garland under the Mountain”, and many of the winners of the “Red Girl” award. The author of “garland”, “girl” are very fond of. If I want to vote, it is in favor of two parallel awards. I think, who won the award, everyone can insist. However, in the assessment, the reason should be convincing. “Rooster Award” selection of the whole story, I have no way of knowing. However, judging from the reasons for the unsuccessful election of “garland”, it is worth discussing. The Economic Times published an article entitled "