论文部分内容阅读
发生在江苏淮安的一起职务侵占案,被害人坚持举报和申诉,公安机关三次移送检察院审查,检察院决定不逮捕、不起诉。该案历经4年,至今未果。对于此案,纵观公安机关和检察机关的说法,其实他们都在坚持同一个观点,那就是依法办案,不枉不纵。但是,两种坚持的结果,似乎南辕北辙。立案侦查罗华恩和陈理华都是浙江台州人。2003年年初,一直在台州做机电生意的罗华恩巧遇了长期从事房地产开发的陈理华。2003年5月22日,罗华恩和陈理华共同出资800万元,在江苏淮安注册成立了江苏前程房地产开发有限公
Occurred in Huai’an, Jiangsu, a case of occupation embezzlement, the victim insisted the reporting and appeals, the public security organ three times transferred to the Procuratorate review, the Procuratorate decided not to arrest, no prosecution. The case after 4 years, so far failed. In this case, we can see from both the public security organs and the procuratorial organs that in fact they are all sticking to the same view that handling cases in accordance with the law can not be ignored. However, the two insisted results seem totally different. Investigating the case Luo Huane and Chen Lihua are Taizhou, Zhejiang Province. In early 2003, Luo Huane, who had been doing electromechanical business in Taizhou, met with Chen Lihua, who has been engaged in real estate development for a long time. May 22, 2003, Luo Huane and Chen Lihua jointly funded 8000000 yuan, Jiangsu Huaian registered the establishment of Jiangsu Future Real Estate Development Co., Ltd.