论文部分内容阅读
实践中对违法所得的追缴存在诸多困惑,对追缴的性质、没收财产刑的对象均有待厘清和明确,特别是民营企业(家)涉嫌犯罪时涉案财物的确定。对违法所得的追缴应以犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的违法所得为限,且应坚持相当性原则和过苛调整原则;对违禁品的没收,原则上无论违禁品是属于犯罪嫌疑人、被告人还是第三人,均应当予以没收;对供犯罪所用的本人财物的没收应坚持直接关联性原则;追缴属于程序性处分措施;没收财产刑的对象应当仅限于属于犯罪人所有的合法财产。
In practice, there are many puzzles in the recovery of illegal gains. The nature of the recovery and the object of confiscation of property crimes need to be clarified and clarified. In particular, the determination of the property involved in the criminal activities of private-owned enterprises (or their families) in connection with their crimes should be clarified. The recovery of illegal gains shall be limited to the illegal gains of criminal suspects and defendants and shall uphold the principle of comparability and over-adjustment. Confiscation of contraband shall, in principle, be carried out regardless of whether the contraband is a criminal suspect or a defendant Or the third party should be confiscated; the confiscation of the personal belongings used for the crime should insist on the principle of direct relevance; the recovery is a procedural sanction measure; the object of confiscation of property punishment should be limited to the legal property belonging to the offender.