近年来群众影评蓬勃发展。广大观众尽管层次不同,但许多人都喜欢对看过的影片作出自己的评价,其中许多人还把自己的看法诉诸文字,写成一篇篇各具特色的评论文章:其中不乏有文采、有真知灼见的佳作。这是当代人喜欢独立思考,并勇于自我表现的反映。是十分可喜的。在此基础上,一些有识之士大声疾呼要求进一步提高群众影评的质量,这无疑是正确的。但对如何提高、提高的标准是什么,是向专家靠拢还是保持群众影评的特色,人们有不同的看法。我个人认为向专家靠拢的提法是不足取的,群众影评就是群众影评,它应该保持自己的特色。如果说“影评是电影艺术与观众的桥梁”这一命 In recent years, mass critics booming. Although the audiences are different in level, many people like to make their own comments on the movies they have seen. Many of them also resort to their own words and write down an article with a distinctive commentary: Insightful masterpiece. This is a reflection of contemporary people who like to think independently and who are brave in their own self-expression. Is very gratifying. On this basis, it is undoubtedly correct that some people of insight are crying out for further improvement in the quality of mass film criticism. However, people have different views on how to improve and raise the standard of what they are, whether they should move closer to experts or keep the mass criticism. I personally think that the reference to experts is not enough, the mass criticism is mass criticism, it should maintain its own characteristics. If we say that “film criticism is the bridge between film art and the audience,” this life