论文部分内容阅读
在建构中国社会科学学科的制度化过程中，知识界对“建构者／被建构者”关系的集体性不意识，表现为一种对西方社会科学的“前反思性接受”取向，渗透在实践中，嵌入在制度化进程中，在某种程度上型塑着中国历史、政治、经济和社会一文化的发展研究的品格。本文是对与此相关的西方社会科学学科制度及其赖以为基础的一系列理论假设做出检讨。作者认为，任何一种或一门社会科学都是以某种哲学或意识形态承诺为基础的。沃勒斯坦《否思社会科学》和《开放社会科学》两书的真正贡献在于它为促使更多具有高度批判力和反思意识的知识分子成为另一种社会科学知识的真正生产者提供了某种可能性。
In the course of institutionalizing China’s social sciences, the collective unconsciousness of the constructor / constructor in the intellectual circles is manifested as a kind of “pre-reflective acceptance” of western social sciences, Embedded in the process of institutionalization and, to a certain extent, shaped the character of the development of Chinese history, politics, economy and social-cultural development. This article is a review of the related Western social science disciplines and the series of theoretical assumptions upon which they are based. The author believes that any one or a social science is based on some kind of philosophical or ideological commitment. The real contribution of Wallerstein’s book, “No Social Science” and “Open Social Science,” lies in the fact that it provides some true producer of knowledge to enable more highly-critical and reflective intellectuals to become another kind of social science knowledge Possibility.