论文部分内容阅读
2012年10月27日上午,英国肯特大学商学院刘文斌教授作了以“基于期刊早间接收率及引文的科研评估”为题的学术报告。首先刘文斌教授解释了英国高等教育基金委员会给出的“科研”的定义,科研是调查过程中出现的能快速分享的新见解和新主张。从这个定义可以得知,科研产出应该具有两个特性:一是新见解和新主张;二是能快速分享的。因此研究产出质量的文献计量评估框架应该也由这两个方面组成,分别表现了重要性和影响力,而研究论文的质量是重在测量新见解和新主张。
On the morning of October 27, 2012, Professor Liu Wenbin from the Business School of the University of Kent in the UK made an academic report titled “Scientific Evaluation Based on Periodical Morning Reception and Citation”. First, Professor Liu Wenbin explained the definition of “scientific research” given by the British Higher Education Fund Commission. Scientific research is a new opinion and new idea that can be quickly shared during the investigation. From this definition we can see that research output should have two characteristics: one is new insights and new ideas; the other is quick sharing. Therefore, the metrological evaluation framework for the study of output quality should also be composed of these two aspects, which show the importance and influence respectively, and the quality of the research papers focuses on measuring new opinions and new ideas.