论文部分内容阅读
作为知识产权国际立法的核心,《TRIPS协定》引发的争论、质疑、不满和愤怒从未平息,发达国家与发展中国家、最不发达国家之间的利益博弈直接导致了对知识产权国际保护制度合法性的讨论。相对公平正义是知识产权国际保护制度合法性判断的一个应有内涵。从动态利益平衡的视角分析,知识产权国际保护制度有着正当性、合理性的理论支撑。与其说知识产权国际保护制度出现了合法性危机,不如说是对该制度存在更多的合理性期待。
As the core of the international legislation of intellectual property, the controversy, doubt, dissatisfaction and anger caused by “TRIPS Agreement” have never subsided. The game of interests between the developed countries and the developing countries and the least developed countries has directly led to the system of international protection of intellectual property Legitimacy discussion. Relative fairness and justice is a necessary connotation of judging the validity of the international protection system of intellectual property. From the perspective of dynamic balance of interests, the international protection of intellectual property system has the legitimacy and rationality of theoretical support. Instead of legitimating a crisis in the international protection of intellectual property, it is better to say that there is more reasonable expectation of the system.