主持人语:自近代清末民初以来,中国传统哲学需要一个现代转型,似乎是一个公认的事实。但20世纪90年代以来似乎对此观点提出了疑义。按照这种疑义,由于近代以来借用西方话语来进行中国传统哲学的现代化,中国学者在国际对话中发不出自己的声音,因而在中国哲学的语言表达、沟通和解读上长期处于“失语”状态。这种疑义通过赛义德所谓东方学而提高到更尖锐的程度,认为西方对东方思想的支配和控制,很大程度是通过东方学者对自己文化的“再现”来实现,东方学者通过西方叙述框架和概 Moderator: Since the late Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China, the traditional Chinese philosophy needs a modern transformation. It seems to be a generally accepted fact. However, this view seems to have been questioned since the 1990s. According to this kind of doubt, since modern times borrowed Western discourse to modernize traditional Chinese philosophy, Chinese scholars can not express their own voices in international dialogue. Therefore, in the language expression, communication and interpretation of Chinese philosophy, “status. This doubt is raised to a sharper level by Saeed’s so-called Orientalism. He believes that the Western domination and control of the Eastern thought is largely achieved through the Oriental scholars’ ”reappearance" of their own culture. Oriental scholars have passed Western narrative framework and outline