论文部分内容阅读
《行政复议法实施条例》创设了驳回行政复议申请决定方式,而《行政复议法修改专家建议稿(讨论稿)》作了进一步完善。本文以二者为素材,分析了行政复议驳回决定制度的立法演进、现存问题及其完善等方面,认为,将理由不成立情形下的不作为案件决定方式由驳回行政复议申请改为驳回行政复议请求,不作为案件决定方式更趋逻辑性;将驳回行政复议申请决定专门适用于不当受理问题处理,驳回行政复议申请决定适用范围设定更趋合理性;只为驳回行政复议申请决定设置行政监督路径,驳回决定监督路径设计更趋现实性;不当驳回后“恢复审理”违背程序法治原理,改“恢复审理”为“重新审理”凸显立法修正必要性。
The Regulations on the Implementation of the Administrative Reconsideration Law have created a decision-making method for rejecting applications for administrative reconsideration, and the “Proposal for the Revision of Administrative Reconsideration Law (Discussion Paper)” has been further improved. This article takes the two as the material, analyzes the legislative evolution, the existing problems and the perfection of the administrative reconsideration rejection system, and considers that the administrative reconsideration request is rejected from the rejection of the administrative reconsideration decision , Not as a way to decide the case more logical; the decision to reject the application for administrative reconsideration specifically applies to the issue of improper reception, rejected the application for administrative reconsideration decision to set the scope of the more reasonable; only to dismiss the decision of administrative reconsideration decision administrative supervision path , Rejected the decision to monitor the path design more realistic; improper rejection “resumption of trial ” contrary to the principle of procedural rule of law, change “resumption of trial ” to “retrial ” highlights the need for legislative amendments.