我们在肯定绩效考评机制积极作用的同时也应当正视其存在的问题。考评机制由于其考评指标、考评操作和考评效果等方面的缺陷,而无法全面替代民主评价机制。很难科学设计考评指标。一是考评指标难以定性、定量。考评指标的文字描述有一定的模糊性,不易准确判断。比如有些地方的指标体系中规定:“民意调查、听取意见、专家论证、社会听证、风险评估、合法性审查、集体讨论决定是重大行政决策的必经程序”。但哪些属于重大决策则是一个很 While affirming the active role of performance appraisal mechanism, we should also face up to its existing problems. The evaluation mechanism can not fully replace the democratic evaluation mechanism due to its defects in evaluation indicators, evaluation operations and evaluation results. Difficult to design scientific evaluation index. First, the evaluation index is difficult to qualitative and quantitative. Evaluation of the text description of the index has a certain degree of ambiguity, not easy to judge accurately. For example, the index system in some places stipulates: “Opinion polls, opinions, expert testimony, social hearings, risk assessment, legality review and collective decision-making are the necessary procedures for major administrative decisions.” But what is important is a big decision