论文部分内容阅读
【目的】探讨混合式评审是否是期刊论文的较为理想的评审方式。【方法】分析《经济研究》杂志近21年论文引用数据的阶段性差异来比较不同评审方式的效果。【结果】从月平均引用量和前30%高引用文章占总引用比例两个指标来看,混合式评审对于《经济研究》杂志而言优于匿名评审和公开评审。【结论】需要以实证数据为依据,进一步探讨何种评审方式最有利于学术发展。
【Objective】 To explore whether hybrid assessment is the ideal way to judge journal articles. 【Method】 The author analyzed the difference of stages of quotation data in “Journal of Economic Research” in the past 21 years to compare the effect of different review methods. 【Results】 From the two indexes of the monthly average citations and the top 30% citations, the hybrid review is superior to Anonymous Review and Public Review in Economic Research magazine. 【Conclusion】 The empirical data need to be used as a basis to further explore what kind of assessment method is most conducive to academic development.