论文部分内容阅读
世界经济学学会隆重开会,高朋满座,学友如云。我,张薰华,今年91岁了。虽年迈未能参与盛会,然心向往之。恭请大会组委会代为转达我对大会奖励的感谢,也对组委会表示谢意。我在中国经历了各种社会变动,在求学过程中,又是在“学海中苦作舟”。我高中时在苏州工业学校学过土木工程,1940年进入复旦农学院,1942年转入经济系直到现在。在经济系阅读《资本论》时,我注意到马克思的两条教导:一条是说马克思的著作是一个艺术整体,但要达到这一点,只有用他的方法;另一条是指出《资本论》最终的目的在揭示现代社会的经济运动规律。这使目的与方法结合在一起。具体来说,他是用唯物辩证法改造黑格尔的唯心辩证法,并用以揭示经济规律。列宁早就指出:“不钻研和不理解黑格尔的全部逻辑学,就不能完全理解马克思的《资本论》。”黑格尔是从绝对精神出发,展开到具体,即唯心辩证法。马克思则汲取其辩证法,反其道而行,由具体到抽象,形成唯物辩证法。黑格尔认为,逻辑理念的发展是“从单纯的规定性开始,而后继的总是更
World Economic Society grand meeting, full friends, friends like the cloud. Me, Zhang Xuanhua, 91 years old this year. Although elderly failed to participate in the event, but heart yearning. Please congratulate the Organizing Committee on behalf of the General Assembly to convey my thanks to the Assembly rewards, but also thank the Organizing Committee. I have experienced all kinds of social changes in China. In the course of studying, I was still in ”learning from the sea“. When I was in high school, I had studied civil engineering in Suzhou Industrial School. In 1940 I went to Fudan College of Agriculture, and in 1942 I transferred to the Department of Economics until now. While reading the ”Theory of Capital“ in the Department of Economics, I noticed Marx’s two teachings: one is to say that Marx’s work is an artistic whole, but to achieve this it is only his method; the other is to point out that ”capital theory“ The ultimate goal is to reveal the law of economic movement in modern society. This combines purpose and method. Specifically, he used the materialist dialectics to transform Hegel’s idealistic dialectics and used it to reveal economic laws. Lenin pointed out long ago: ”Without studying and understanding Hegel’s entire logic, we can not completely understand Marx’s“ capital theory. ”“ Hegel proceeded from absolute spirit to concreteness, that is, idealistic dialectics. Marx draws on its dialectics and goes in the opposite direction, from concreteness to abstraction, and forms materialist dialectics. Hegel argues that the development of logical ideas is that ”starting from mere formality, the successor is always more