论文部分内容阅读
目的比较传统治疗方法、传统方法联合高压氧治疗方法治疗末梢神经炎的效果。方法选择四肢末梢神经炎患者56例,随机分为传统治疗组和联合治疗组各28例。传统治疗组采用营养神经、扩血管等对症治疗方法 ,联合治疗组采用传统疗法联合高压氧治疗;两组患者均治疗1个月,随访半年,观察治疗效果。结果传统治疗组总有效率为65.38%,联合治疗组总有效率为90.00%;且两者治疗有效情况的差异具有统计学意义(Z=-2.006,P<0.05)。结论传统方法联合高压氧治疗末梢神经炎效果较好,值得推广。
Objective To compare the traditional treatment methods, the traditional method combined with hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the treatment of peripheral neuritis effect. Methods 56 cases of peripheral neuritis in limbs were randomly divided into the traditional treatment group and the combined treatment group of 28 cases. The traditional treatment group adopted nutrition nerves and vasodilator symptomatic treatment. The combination therapy group was treated with traditional therapy and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Both groups were treated for one month and followed up for six months to observe the therapeutic effect. Results The total effective rate was 65.38% in the traditional treatment group and 90.00% in the combined treatment group. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (Z = -2.006, P <0.05). Conclusion The traditional method of hyperbaric oxygen treatment of peripheral neuritis better, it is worth promoting.