论文部分内容阅读
《庄子·天下》所载辩者命题可归纳为两类:第一类命题,揭示了墨家唯实逻辑的根本缺陷,即概念内涵开放,无法最终定义;第二类命题,表达了名家唯名逻辑的主张,强调“名”的唯一性,“名”与“名”之间互不相涉,并对复名和极限名词作了探索,提出了定性推理命题和定量推理命题。揭示墨家逻辑缺陷,确立名家逻辑,此乃辩者命题之根本宗旨。
The propositions of the dialectics contained in Zhuangzi Tiandia can be divided into two categories: the first kind of proposition reveals the fundamental defect of the realistic logic of the Mohist School, that is, the connotation of the concept is open and can not be finally defined; the second kind of proposition expresses the famous name Logical proposition emphasizes the uniqueness of “name ”, “name ” and “name ” do not relate to each other, and to explore the compound name and limit nouns, proposed qualitative reasoning proposition and quantitative reasoning Proposition To reveal the logic defects of the Mohist School and to establish the logic of famous masters is the basic purpose of the proposition of the debate.