论文部分内容阅读
市场经济的发展,商标的功能作用日益得到重视,由商标引发的相关纠纷日益增多。在商标侵权纠纷案件的审理中,如何对商标侵权进行科学认定是审判的核心,也是审判中的一个难题。目前,我国法律规定中对“混淆可能性”有所缺失,法官在审判实践中也对“混淆可能性”有所忽略,片面追求商标标识的比对,简单得出商标近似的结论,导致司法裁判结果的不一致。文章将从我国的立法和司法实践出发,尝试建立以“混淆可能性为主导”的商标侵权判定的司法审判形式,以期能对我国商标侵权司法判定有所启示。
With the development of market economy, the function of trademarks has been paid more and more attention. The disputes caused by trademarks have been increasing day by day. In the trial of trademark infringement dispute cases, how to scientifically determine the trademark infringement is the core of the trial and also a difficult problem in the trial. At present, there is a lack of “confusion possibility” in our country’s legal provisions. Judges also neglect the possibility of “confusion” in trial practice. One-sided pursuit of the comparison of trademark marks and simple approximation of trademark Conclusion, leading to inconsistencies in the outcome of judicial decisions. Based on the legislation and judicial practice in our country, the article attempts to establish the judicial trial form of the judgment of trademark infringement based on the possibility of confusion, with a view to enlightenment on the judicial judgment of trademark infringement in our country.