论文部分内容阅读
文学史的书写者应该是带有专业审视眼光的阅读者、接受者,也应该是敢于对历史“改写”的文化立场鲜明者。从对待历史的态度、个人书写痕迹、评价文学的标准、政治色彩、“经典化”问题、写作模式问题等多方面考察几本新近的当代文学史著作,可得出这样的结论:文学史的写作最后总还是一种操作行为,它在历史的表象和记录之间寻觅点滴空白和沉淀,“补白”和“开掘”是文学史书写的一个意义非凡的任务,这里的书写者始终是作为严格意义上的文学接受者存在的。
The writer of literary history should be a reader or receiver with a professional eye for examination, or a dictatorial cultural position that dares to ’rewrite’ history. From the attitude of treating history, traces of personal writing, standard of evaluating literature, political color, “classic ” problem, writing mode problems and many other aspects of modern history of literature, we can draw a conclusion: literature Writing in the history is still an operation in the end. It looks for a bit of blank space and sedimentation between the appearance and the record of history. The “filing” and “digging” are an extraordinary task in the writing of literary history. Here Writers have always existed as literary recipients in the strict sense.