论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨两种无痛人工流产的临床效果。方法将本院180例自愿要求人工流产的健康女性随机分成A组(60例)、B组(60例)、对照组(60例),A组采用异丙酚静注,B组采用氧气吸入,对照组进行常规人流术。结果 A组总有效率明显高于B组与对照组,三组相互比较,差别均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组患者阴道出血量比较,差别无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组人工流产综合征明显高于A组、B组,比较差别有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论异丙酚用于人工流产操作简单、起效迅速、副作用小、无药物蓄积现象,苏醒后意识恢复完全、安全可靠等优点,值得临床广泛推广。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of two painless induced abortion. Methods A total of 180 healthy women who were asked for voluntary abortion were randomly divided into group A (60 cases), group B (60 cases) and control group (60 cases). Group A received intravenous propofol and group B received oxygen inhalation , Control group for conventional abortion. Results The total effective rate of group A was significantly higher than that of group B and control group, the three groups were compared with each other, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Three groups of patients with vaginal bleeding, the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). The control group of induced abortion syndrome was significantly higher than the A group, B group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Propofol has many advantages such as simple operation, rapid onset of action, small side effects, no accumulation of drug, complete recovery of consciousness after recovery, safety and reliability, which is worthy of wide application in clinic.