目的比较旁入法行中心静脉导管腰大池引流术与传统直入法的引流效果。方法将32例蛛网膜下腔出血患者随机分为两组,分别采用直入法和旁入法行中心静脉导管腰大池引流,比较导管通畅和并发症情况。结果两组管通畅及并发症比较,差异无统计学意义。结论旁入法行中心静脉导管腰大池引流效果优于传统直入法。 Objective To compare the drainage effect of inserting the central venous catheter lumbar drainage and traditional direct injection into the law. Methods Thirty-two patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage were randomly divided into two groups. The patients were treated with central venous catheter lumbar drainage by straight-line method and by-pass method respectively. The complications and complications were compared. Results The two groups of patency and complication complications, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions The drainage efficiency of central venous catheter lumbar drainage is superior to that of traditional direct admission method.