论文部分内容阅读
本文主要就居延新简中发现的简册“相剑刀册”进行分析,对简册的竹简数量、内容的完整性、原始书写格式及相剑的标准问题作了初步的探讨,进而对此前存在的某些解释提出了补充和修正。作者认为“相剑刀册”作为一册完整的简文,文字缺佚情况发生在EPT40·206、EPT40·207二简间,但缺佚文字并非此前学者们怀疑的是“利善剑文”的具体内容,而应是对“利善剑文”进行小结的“右利善剑文四事”诸语。同时认为简册文本格式在传播过程中发生较大变化,并且做了初步的复原。关于简文所记利善剑、弊剑诸事具体内容的阐释,也与此前存在的解释不完全一致。
This article mainly analyzes the simple book “Sword Knife Book ” found in Juyan Xinjian, and makes a preliminary discussion on the issue of the bamboo slips, content integrity, original writing format and standards of Sword, Then some of the explanations of the existence of the previous proposed additions and amendments. The author believes that the “Sword Knife Book” as a complete essay, the lack of text occurs in the case of EPT40 · 206, EPT40 · 207 two simple, but the missing text is not previously suspected by scholars is “good Swordsman ”specific content, but should be “ Li Shan Jianwen ”summary “ right Lee Jian-swords four things ”all language. At the same time, it is considered that the format of the booklet text has undergone major changes in the process of dissemination, and a preliminary restoration has been made. Explanations of the specific contents of Li Jian and Jian Ma Sword in the essay are also not entirely consistent with the explanations that existed before.