论文部分内容阅读
目的:调查了解边防团官兵疲劳状况及其影响因素。方法:采用多维疲劳量表(MFI-20)中文版、特质应对方式问卷等对边防某团304例官兵进行测评。结果:体力疲劳51例,占18.1%;脑力疲劳67例,占23.8%;动力下降35例,占12.5%;活动减少87例,占30.9%。海拔2000～3000 m组官兵疲劳总分分值显著高于<1000 m组官兵(P<0.05)。步兵营官兵疲劳总分、体力疲劳和脑力疲劳分值非常显著高于边防营官兵(P<0.01)。兵龄≤2年组脑力疲劳、疲劳总分分值显著高于3～5年组和≥6年组(P<0.05)。士兵组和军官组体力疲劳分值显著高于士官组(P<0.05);士兵组脑力疲劳分值显著高于军官组(P<0.05)和士官组(P<0.01),军官组脑力疲劳分值显著高于士官组(P<0.05);士兵组和军官组疲劳总分分值显著高于士官组(P<0.05)。消极应对与体力疲劳、脑力疲劳和疲劳总分分值呈非常显著正相关(P<0.01);积极应对与体力疲劳、脑力疲劳、活动下降和疲劳总分分值呈非常显著负相关(P<0.01),但消极应对对疲劳的影响大于积极应对。一般自我效能感分值与体力疲劳、脑力疲劳、活动下降和疲劳总分分值呈非常显著负相关(P<0.01)。结论:任务性质、兵龄、职务、应对方式等均是边防官兵疲劳的影响因素。
Objective: To investigate and understand the state of fatigue of officers and soldiers of border guards and its influencing factors. Methods: A total of 304 officers and soldiers of a certain border defense group were evaluated by using the Chinese version of Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Scale (MFI-20) and the questionnaire of trait coping style. Results: Physical fatigue in 51 cases, accounting for 18.1%; mental fatigue in 67 cases, accounting for 23.8%; power decreased 35 cases, accounting for 12.5%; activity decreased 87 cases, accounting for 30.9%. The total fatigue score of officers and soldiers at 2000 ~ 3000 m altitude was significantly higher than that of officers and soldiers at <1000 m altitude (P <0.05). Infantry battalion officers and soldiers fatigue scores, physical fatigue and mental fatigue scores were significantly higher than the border battalion officers and soldiers (P <0.01). The total fatigue score of soldiers younger than 2 years was significantly higher than that of 3 ~ 5 years and ≥ 6 years (P <0.05). The score of physical fatigue in soldiers group and officer group was significantly higher than that in non-officer group (P <0.05). The scores of mental fatigue in soldiers group were significantly higher than those in military officer group and non-officer group (P <0.01) (P <0.05). The total fatigue scores of soldiers and officers were significantly higher than those of non-soldiers (P <0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between negative coping and physical fatigue, mental fatigue and total fatigue scores (P <0.01). There was a significant negative correlation between active coping and physical fatigue, mental fatigue, activity decline and total fatigue score (P < 0.01), but the negative response to fatigue than the positive response. General self-efficacy scores and physical fatigue, mental fatigue, activity decline and total fatigue score was a significant negative correlation (P <0.01). Conclusion: The nature of the mission, the age of soldiers, positions, coping styles and so on are the influencing factors of the fatigue of border guards and soldiers.