论文部分内容阅读
限定摹状词的指称性使用和归属性使用的区分奠定了新指称理论的基础。对该区分是语义性质还是语用性质的区分之争论至今仍在持续。文章从比较摹状词的指称性使用与说话者指称入手,通过考察回指现象以及分析萨尔蒙和怀斯坦对于区分性质的争论,我们提出用彻底的索引词解释来分析摹状词的指称性使用中的语义行为,以消除描述论者和指称论者各自可能面临的理论困难。
The distinction between the alleged use of qualifying words and the use of belongingness lays the groundwork for a new theory of allegation. The debate over whether the distinction is semantic or pragmatic is still ongoing. Starting from the comparison of the alleged use of the descriptions and the speaker’s allegations, the article analyzes the allegations of the descriptions by referring to the anaphora and analyzing the controversy over the nature of the differences between Salmon and Wyeth. Semantic behavior in sexual use to eliminate the theoretical difficulties each of the descriptive and referential theorists may face.