论文部分内容阅读
本研究采用投射测验,通过集体开放式问卷的形式来比较工读生和普通生攻击性行为社会问题解决的特点。结果表明:(1)和普通生相比,工读生在社会问题的解决中攻击性和操纵性反应比较明显,亲社会的策略较少。(2)当被要求寻找其他替代性的策略去解决问题时,工读生提出的解决问题的策略的数量通常少于普通学生,解决问题的方式、变通性和可行性都较普通学生差,可以看出他们缺乏人际冲突解决的必要技巧和方法。他们在社会问题解决上表现出的这些特点都和他们的攻击性行为有一定的关系。
This study uses a projection test to compare the characteristics of social problem-solving among college graduates and ordinary students with aggressive behavior through the form of a collective open questionnaire. The results showed that: (1) Compared with ordinary students, the study-based students were more aggressive and manipulative in solving social problems, with fewer pro-social strategies. (2) When asked to find other alternative strategies to solve the problem, the number of problem-solving strategies proposed by the students is usually less than that of ordinary students. The way to solve the problem is that the adaptability and feasibility are worse than that of ordinary students. It shows that they lack the necessary skills and methods to solve interpersonal conflicts. All of these features they show in solving social problems have a bearing on their offensive behavior.