论文部分内容阅读
本文首先通过回溯衡平法上的“弃权与禁止反言(Waiver and Estoppel)”制度,探究国际商事仲裁中的默示弃权制度的逻辑与历史源流。继而对各主要国际商事仲裁规则、外国立法和判例以及中国《仲裁法》及2006年司法解释关于默示弃权制度规定进行比较分析,指出该制度对尊重当事人意“支持仲裁”的价值和对之加以进一步系统继受和完善的可能性。同时,也在比较法的层面上探讨我国仲裁法“移植”上述制度的现状与困境。
This article first explores the logic and historical origin of the implied disclaimer in international commercial arbitration by backtracking the equitable and estoppel system. Then it makes a comparative analysis of the rules of the major international commercial arbitration rules, foreign legislation and jurisprudence, China’s Arbitration Law and the judicial interpretations on implied disclaimer in 2006, and points out that the system has the value of respecting the parties’ meaning of “supporting arbitration” and The possibility of further systematic succession and improvement. At the same time, we also discuss the status quo and predicament of the above system of “Arbitration Law” in our country at the comparative law level.