论文部分内容阅读
如果回到历史现场,可以发现,所谓1917年苏俄十月革命的成功,对当时的中华民国并未产生人们想象和描述中的影响。即便是李大钊1918年前后热情洋溢地发表了《法俄革命之比较观》、《庶民的胜利》和《Bolshevism的胜利》等文,也未在民众中产生太大的热情。金观涛、刘青峰在《观念史研究:中国现代重要政治术语的形成》中考察了《新青年》有关“十月革命”出现的频率和次数后证实说:“在十月革命发生的1917年及其后一
If we return to the historical scene, we can see that the so-called success of the October Revolution in Russia in 1917 did not have any impact in the imagination or description of the ROC at that time. Even before Li Dazhao made a warm and flirtation about the comparison of the French and Russian revolutions around 1918, the victory of common people and the victory of Bolshevism, it did not produce much enthusiasm among the people. Jin Guantao and Liu Qingfeng inspected the frequency and frequency of the ”October Revolution“ appearing in ”New Youth“ after ”the study of the history of ideas: the formation of important political terms in modern China.“ After confirming that ”the October Revolution took place 1917 and the latter