论文部分内容阅读
校勘之际,一般只将版本异同记入校勘记中。而对于比勘相关文献所见内容之异同,校勘者的见解与处理则颇有不同。因为这类他校的异同,似乎已经超出了校勘范围,类如注释或笺证,所以不少校勘者遇到这类异同,认为有碍校勘体例,便舍弃放过,没有写入校勘记。我以为对这种他校异同的舍弃放过甚为可惜。我在校勘时,遇到这类异同,一般都不予割爱,统统记入校勘记,作为参考,留给读者。以下,略举校勘《钱塘遗事》时所遭遇之数例。
On the occasion of the collation, only the similarities and differences of the editions are generally recorded in the collation records. However, for the similarities and differences between the contents of the survey and the related documents, the collation of the surveyors is rather different. Because similarities and differences in such schools seem to have gone beyond the scope of collation, such as notes or testimonies, so many colliers encountered such similarities and differences, that the hindering of collation, they give up let go, did not write collation. I think it is a pity that we should abandon such similarities and differences of his school. When I collapsed, I encountered such similarities and differences, generally do not cut love, all recorded collation, as a reference, left to the reader. The following is a few examples of what happened to the collation of the “Qiantang Melaka”.