论文部分内容阅读
县法院前任副院长的儿子深夜回家,掌管法院大门钥匙的院长却不开门,前任副院长于是用铁锤猛砸门锁。第二天,县法院称“砸门行为”与领导干部身份不符,发公函给了县委、县人大、县政府、县政协“四大班子”要求“严加管束”。公函中诸多语言引来“副院长”强烈不满,并称县法院发公函是对他变相进行诽谤,公函的实质是法院院长将个人意志上升为法院意志对他进行打击报复。为此,法院前任副院长与法院及法院院长对簿公堂。两级法院庭审均认为县法院此举不构成名誉侵权,而县法院院长掌管钥匙是为了单位安全……
The son of the former vice-president of the county court went home late at night, but the chief in charge of the key to the court’s door did not open the door, and the former vice president smashed the door with a hammer. The next day, the county court said the “Zhameng behavior” did not match the identity of leading cadres. An official letter was sent to the county party committee and county people’s congress and the county government and county CPPCC “four groups” demanded “strict control.” Many languages in the official letter aroused strong dissatisfaction with the “vice president,” saying that the county court issued an official letter defaming him in disguise. The essence of the letter was that the court president raised his personal will to the will of the court to fight retaliation against him. To this end, the former vice president of the court and the court and court president court. Both court hearings consider that the county court does not constitute infringement of reputation, and that the chief of the county court controls the keys for the sake of unit safety ...