论文部分内容阅读
卞本独特异文突兀、别扭、勉强、乖谬处不少,虽可双向诠释,仍存疑惑。题识中“他本”“戚本”“脂本”等语确乎费解,似露伪迹。正方考出眉庵即刘文介,可惜关键环节欠凿实,目前还难断言刘文介就是卞本的真正题识人兼旧藏主。古籍鉴定打折扣,本子来历不明白,皆为憾事。卞本研究已历十年,气氛活跃,成绩显著,但真赝之争并未圆满结束。亟盼正反双方再行磋商,努力争取一枚过硬的惊叹号。
Bian unique absurd, awkward, barely, a lot of absurdities, though two-way interpretation, still doubts confusion. Inscrutable “His ” “Qi ” “fat” and other language is indeed puzzling, like revealing artifacts. Zheng Mei Temple that is Liu Wen-mediated, but unfortunately the key link owes a credible, it is still difficult to assert that Liu Wen-sheng is Bian of the true title and old Tibetans. Discount ancient books, the book does not understand the origin, all regrettable. Bian this study has been going on for ten years, the atmosphere is active, the result is remarkable, but the dispute of true pseudo not quite ended satisfactorily. Urgently both forward and reverse negotiations, strive for a perfect exclamation point.