在文学上,一位前辈是否有意义,取决于这位前辈是否曾对后辈产生过影响。但如果仅仅是一位过去式的前辈,后辈也就有可能反过来唾弃他、忘记他、不愿提起他,就像一个人可能会唾弃、忘记、不愿提起自己的过去。从现在的角度看,这位前辈对后辈实际上也就失去了意义,即使仍残存一种? Literally, whether a predecessor makes any difference depends on whether or not the predecessor had an impact on the younger generation. If only a predecessor predecessor, the younger generation may in turn cast aside him, forget him, do not want to mention him, just as one person may cast aside, forget, do not want to mention their own past. From the present point of view, this predecessor actually lost meaning to the younger generation, even though it still survives?