论文部分内容阅读
批改作文的方法多种多样,没有定规,应根据具体情况来做。我校每个班七十多个学生,一个语文老师任两班语文课,这么多作文要全面精批细改是很难办到的。因此,必须把好作文讲评这一关。用什么方法讲评好呢?我觉得用“比较法”讲评的效果较好。比较是思维过程的重要形式之一,有比较,才能鉴别。用“比较法”讲评能收事半功倍的效果。这里仅举一例。我教初一语文时,看到学生的作文普遍记叙不具体。本来是一件与主题紧密相关的事情,他们三言两语就说完了。针对这个问题,我起初花了两节课的时间,讲解什么叫“具体”,什么叫“不具体”。我旁征博引,讲得头头是道,自以为学生听懂
There are many ways to modify essay, there is no regulation, should be based on the specific circumstances to do. Each class in our school more than 70 students, a language teacher for any two classes of language, so many essay to fully fine detail is difficult to change. Therefore, we must make a good essay to comment on this level. What method to comment on the good? I think “Comparative Law” comment on the effect is better. Comparison is one of the important forms of thinking process, there is a comparison in order to identify. Use the “comparative method” to comment on the effect of reducing the number of failures. Here's just one example. When I taught my first language, I saw the general narration of students' compositions was not specific. Originally a matter closely related to the topic, they finished the few words. In response to this question, I initially spent two classes of time to explain what is “concrete” and what is “not specific.” I consulted Bo cited, speak rhetoric is, I thought the students understand