论文部分内容阅读
目的:对大学生网络欺凌调查表(cyberbullying inventory for college students，CICS)进行汉化，检验其在中国文化背景下的信度和效度并进行初步应用。方法:采用大学生网络欺凌调查表中文版(Chinese version of cyberbullying inventory for college students，CICS-CV)，对1 528位大学生进行调查，6个月后，对其中208名大学生进行重测。状态-特质愤怒表达量表-2的特质愤怒分量表和Buss-Perry攻击量表作为网络欺凌的效标，抑郁-焦虑-压力量表作为网络被欺凌的效标，进行效标效度检验。使用SPSS 24.0进行项目分析、探索性因子分析、信度检验、效标效度检验和交叉滞后分析，采用Mplus 8.3进行验证性因子分析。结果:探索性因素分析得出网络欺凌和网络被欺凌两个因子，因子载荷分别为0.59~0.82，0.59~0.80。验证性因素分析表明，两因子模型的拟合达到测量学要求(n χ2/n df＝2.61，CFI＝0.90，TLI＝0.89，RMSEA＝0.04，SRMR＝0.05)。该量表的内部一致性系数分别为0.88、0.89，重测信度为0.97。网络欺凌、网络被欺凌与各效标问卷之间均呈显著正相关(n r＝0.23~0.42，均n P<0.05)。道德推脱与网络欺凌的交叉滞后分析表明，第一次测量的道德推脱可显著预测第二次测量的网络欺凌(n β＝0.16，n t＝2.16，n P<0.05)。n 结论:CICS-CV具有良好的信度和效度，试用效果良好，可以作为我国大学生网络欺凌的有效测评工具。“,”Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of cyberbullying inventory for college students(CICS-CV)in the context of Chinese culture and make preliminary application.Methods:A total of 1 528 college students completed the CICS-CV, and 208 students completed CICS-CV after six months.Trait anger subscale of state-trait anger expression inventory-2, and Buss-Perry aggressive qusetionnaire were used as the criterion of cyberbullying aggression, and depression anxiety stress scales were used as the criterion for cyberbullying victimization to test its validity. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, reliability test, calibration validity test and corss-lag analysis were conducted by SPSS 24.0 software, and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted by Mplus 8.3.Results:The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that two factors were obtained named as cyberbullying aggression and cyberbullying victimization, and the factor loadings were 0.59-0.82, 0.59-0.80.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitting index of the double factor model was fitting well (n χ2/n df=2.61, CFI=0.90, TLI=0.89, RMSEA=0.04, SRMR=0.05). The internal consistency coefficient of the two subscales were 0.88, 0.89, and test-retest reliability were both 0.97. There was a significant positive correlation between cyberbullying aggression(victimization) and the criterions(n r=0.23-0.42, all n P<0.05). Cross-lag analysis of moral disengagement and cyberbullying aggression showed that the first measurement of moral disengagement significantly predicted the second measurement of cyberbullying aggression(n β=0.16, n t=2.16, n P<0.05).n Conclusion:The CICS-CV has good reliability and validity, which can be used as an effective tool for evaluating college students\' cyberbullying in China.