论文部分内容阅读
《文心雕龙·隐秀》篇补文真伪问题的争论尚未有定论。纪昀、黄侃、刘永济等人从版本、语言似摭后人文章、缺《岁寒堂诗话》引文来否定其真实性,但詹锳和周汝昌一一辩驳。其实补文的诗文引用,违反了《事类》篇引用要注明出处、准确的标准,且补文对李陵和班婕妤的评价、偏好“滋味”、诗歌意象,和钟嵘的《诗品序》极其相近,都可证明补文为伪作。
The controversy over the authenticity of the text of “Wen Xin Diao Long · Implicit Show” has not yet been finalized. Ji Yun, Huang Kan and Liu Yongji et al denied the authenticity of their articles from the versions, language resembling descendants, and lack of citations from “Sui Han Tong Shi Hua Hua”, but Zhan Xi and Zhou Ruchang argued one by one. In fact, the poetic quotations of the supplementary texts violate the quotations of “events” to indicate the source and accurate standard, and the supplementary texts evaluate Li Ling and Ban Jieyu, prefer the taste, poetic image and Zhongrong The “poetry order” is very similar, can prove that the supplementary text is a fake.