去年8月,中国译协文学艺术委员会等几个单位发起,召开了一次“文学翻译评论研讨会”。会上涉及的问题很多,其中之一是文学翻译批评的矛头应该指向什么方面、什么人的问题。是应当着重反对为了发财什么坏书都敢译,而且又是抢译、乱译的那些人呢,还是像前一时期有些文章那样,较集中地批评有影响的老翻译家,甚至包括公认的而又巳故的翻译大师。持前一种看法的人自然是理直气壮。认为对大翻译家也不妨评一评的人都表白自己绝无反对清污之意,但因事情涉及师辈,也未能将心中的看法和盘托出。我个人对这个问题思考了有些时日,近来又读了罗新璋同志的《关 In August last year, China Translation Association literary and art committee and several other units initiated and held a “Literary Translation Review Seminar ”. At the meeting, there are many problems involved. One of them is the question of what should be the target of literary translation criticism and the question of what kind of person. Should we focus on opposing those who dare to translate everything for the sake of making a fortune, and those who steal or translate it? Or, as some articles in the previous period did, focus more heavily on influential old translators, including even recognized ones The late translation master. Those who hold the former view are naturally righteous. Those who think that a translator may as well comment on a translator say they have absolutely no objection to clean-up. However, since the incident involves a generation of teachers, they can not give their own opinions. I have some thoughts on this issue for some time and recently read Comrade Luo Xinzhang’s "