论文部分内容阅读
克林顿卫生保健改革工作组的伦理学工作组提出了一系列应该支配卫生保健改革的原则和价值。这些原则和价值与重要的道德和政治传统是相容的，也与公正和卫生保健更确切的理论解释相容，但它们是“独立的”，大家取得一致的共同点，不以任何理论背景为预设。尽管不精确，没有按轻重缓急排队，但这些原则指导我们有关各种改革方案是否公平的思考。使用这些原则的例证是，根据获得服务的普遍性、分阶段引入、建立不等层次以及提供明智的分配和配给来比较种种方案。
The Ethics Working Group of the Clinton Health Care Reform Working Group has proposed a series of principles and values that should govern health care reform. These principles and values are compatible with important moral and political traditions. They are also compatible with more precise theoretical explanations of justice and health care. But they are “independent” and we all have a common denominator and do not use any theoretical background. Is preset. Although inaccurate and not lined up in accordance with priorities, these principles guide our thinking about whether various reforms are fair. Examples of the use of these principles are the comparison of schemes based on the universality of access to services, the introduction in stages, the establishment of unequal levels, and the provision of wise allocations and rationing.