罗:“人文精神”的讨论已经过去好几年了,据我所知,当时的“寻思录”中是准备讨论教育问题的,因为教育是文化、文明继承与赓续的重要手段,既然关注“人文精神”的“失落”,那么,检讨人文教育的内在阙失就是题中应有之意。但是,除了零星的几篇文章,后来的讨论并未正面触及这个问题,你是不是觉得这是“人文精神”讨论的一个缺憾呢? Luo: It has been several years since the discussion of “humanistic spirit.” As I understand it, “thought-finding records” of the time were intended to discuss the issue of education because education was an important means of inheritance and continuity of culture and civilization. Since attention has been paid to “ Humanistic spirit, ”the“ loss ”, then review the inherent lack of humanistic education is the question should have meaning. However, apart from sporadic articles, subsequent discussions did not directly address this issue. Do you think this is a flaw in the discussion of “humanistic spirit?”