论文部分内容阅读
本文旨在对建设性交锋—交融(constructive engagement)这种比较哲学方法论策略在元哲学和元方法论层次上作一番表征。将通过对现代中国哲学和中西比较哲学中的建设性交锋—交融的反思实践所具有的十个不同特征的表征、强调和解释来完成本文的目标。这十个特征要么是直接反映了比较哲学中这种建设性交锋—交融的方法论策略,要么是贯彻这种策略的效果,要么是与这个策略内在相关。由此,人们就既能够看到比较哲学中的这种一般方法论策略的理论维度,又能看到它在哲学中的实践运用和反思效果。简要地讲,比较哲学或(更一般而论)哲学探索中的建设性交锋—交融的方法论策略是去探索那些来自各种哲学传统或者来自(同一传统中或不同传统间)做哲学的不同风格/取向的不同思想方式、方法论途径、眼光、洞察、基本观点或概念性/解释性资源如何能够通过反思性批判和自身批判而相互学习、携手为共同的哲学事业(对一系列通过哲学解释而共同关注的问题或论题)作出贡献。
The purpose of this article is to characterize the constructive engagement methodology of comparative philosophy at the level of metaphysics and meta-methodology. The goal of this article is to be achieved through the representation, emphasis and explanation of ten different features of the constructive confrontation between modern Chinese philosophy and Chinese and Western comparative philosophy. These ten features either directly reflect this constructive confrontation-comparative methodological approach in comparative philosophy, either as a result of implementing such a strategy or as inherently relevant to the strategy. Thus one can see both the theoretical dimension of this general methodological approach in comparative philosophy and the practical application and reflection of it in philosophy. Briefly, constructive confrontation in philosophical or (more generally) philosophical exploration - the methodological approach to blending is to explore the different styles of philosophies that come from various philosophical traditions or from (the same tradition or different traditions) / Approach, ways, perspectives, insights, basic ideas or conceptual / interpretive resources can learn from each other through reflective criticism and self-criticism and work together as a common philosophical undertaking (for a series of philosophical explanations of Common problems or topics) to contribute.