论文部分内容阅读
知识分子看似极端的政府门前下跪事实上直接反映出了我国公益诉讼所遭遇的困境及其相关法律制度空缺的尴尬处境。文章从引起一定舆论反响的时事出发,反思公益诉讼制度在中国的现状,借鉴美国、印度、德国、日本等国外公益诉讼制度的立法、司法实践经验,深入探究我国建立公益诉讼制度的必要性之所在。在此基础上,本文针对我国现行法律相关制度在公益诉讼制度建立过程中涉及的几个问题,即举证责任、司法审查、法院调查取证等方面进行进一步探讨,并结合给出构建和改革相关制度的建议。
In fact, the kneeling down of the seemingly extremist intellectuals of the intellectuals directly reflects the dilemma encountered in the public interest litigation of our country and the embarrassment of the vacancy of the relevant legal system. This essay starts from the current events which arouse public opinion repercussions and reviews the status quo of public interest litigation system in China. It draws on the legislative and judicial practices of foreign public interest litigation system in the United States, India, Germany and Japan, and probes into the necessity of establishing public interest litigation system in our country. Where you are. On this basis, in this paper, the current legal system in our country in the process of establishing public interest litigation system involves a number of issues, namely, the burden of proof, judicial review, court investigation and evidence gathering and other aspects to be further discussed, and given the construction and reform of the relevant systems Suggestions.