论文部分内容阅读
目的总结分析不同遮盖方式治疗弱视的疗效。方法对确诊为远视屈光参差性弱视者,分为遮盖眼睛组(A组)及遮盖眼镜组(B组)对其疗效进行分析比较。结果A组有效率100%,治愈率91.2%;B组有效率94.4%,治愈率61.1%,无效5.6%。结论两种治疗方式均有效,A组的治愈率及有效率明显高于B组。
Objective To summarize and analyze the curative effects of different masking methods on amblyopia. Methods The patients with amblyopia who were diagnosed with hyperopia and anisometropic amblyopia were divided into shaded eyes group (group A) and shaded glasses group (group B) for analysis and comparison. Results In group A, the effective rate was 100% and the cure rate was 91.2%. The effective rate in group B was 94.4%, the cure rate was 61.1%, and the ineffective rate was 5.6%. Conclusion Both treatment methods are effective. The cure rate and effective rate of group A are obviously higher than that of group B.