作为现实主义法学的代表人物,弗兰克提出了法律不确定性和事实怀疑论两大学说。事实上,在纷繁的法律现象中,我们确实可以发现规则的不确定性、规则与目的的经常背离以及案件事实的难以捕捉。这些因素,都为严格规则主义提出了一道歌德巴赫猜想式的难题。于是,法官的司法自由裁量在司法实践中的重大作用得以彰显,而具备专业素养和职业伦理的法官对法治的介入显然不会重归人治的泥潭。 As a representative of realist jurisprudence, Frank proposed two theories of law uncertainty and factual skepticism. In fact, among the numerous legal phenomena, we can indeed find the uncertainty of the rules, the regular deviation of rules and ends, and the inability to capture the facts of the case. All of these factors present a question of Goethe-Conjectory conjecture for strict rules. Thus, the judicial discretion of the judiciary in judicial practice to highlight the significant role, and with professionalism and professional ethics of the judge’s intervention in the rule of law will obviously not return to the quagmire of the rule of man.