[《柱案学概论》,赵越主编,辽宁大学出版社1987年9月第1版第1次印刷,257页,20万字,续。] 第56页第15～16行,引黄彝仲的《档案管理之理论与实际》中一段文字不准确。“……多因观点与立场不同、持论见互有差异、各以其己之主观……”,实为“……多因观点与立场不同,持论见解互有差异,各以其自己之主观……”。 第56页倒数第1行至第57页第3行,“正如马克思和恩格斯在通信中,谈到获取警官一批文件原件时说:‘这是上种发现,比一切澳大利亚的金矿还有价值’‘一切文件、宣誓书等……”构成一批卓越的辩护、证件。’”这里的毛病有三:(1)这是恩格斯于1852年10月29日致马克思信中提到的两段话,如果不注明“恩格斯致马克思信”,至少也得用“恩格斯与马克思在通信中……说”这样的语句。否则,象现在书中既没有注明“恩格斯致马克思信”,又用了“如马克思和恩格斯在通信中……说”,使人误认为这是马克思在信中说的两段话。(2)所引恩格斯的两段话,连在一起也是可以的, [“Introduction to the column case”, edited by Zhao Yue, Liaoning University Press, September 1987 first edition first printing, 257 pages, 200000 words, continued. ] On page 56, lines 15-16, a passage in “The Theory and Practice of Records Management” of Yizhong Huang is not accurate. “... mostly because of different views and positions, holding different opinions on each other, each with its own subjective ...”, in fact “... ... due to different perspectives and positions, hold opinions differ from each other, each with its own subjective ... ”. Page 56, last line from page 56 to page 57, line 3 “As Marx and Engels talked about in getting correspondence on a batch of documents from police officers, he said: ’This is the kind of discovery that goes beyond all the Australian gold mines Value ’’ all documents, affidavits etc ... ’constitute a group of outstanding defenses, documents. There are three problems here: (1) This is the two passages quoted by Engels to Marx in his letter of October 29, 1852. If we do not state ”Engels to Marx,“ at least Engels and Marx In communications ... say ... ”Otherwise, neither“ Engels to Marx ”, nor“ Marx and Engels in communications ... say ”, as in the present book, misleads it Marx’s two passages in the letter. (2) The two quotes from Engels can be linked together,